• Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or My Tools.

Large Cross-National Differences in Gene × Socioeconomic Status Interaction on Intelligence

  1. Elliot M. Tucker-Drob1,2
  2. Timothy C. Bates3
  1. 1Department of Psychology, University of Texas at Austin
  2. 2Population Research Center, University of Texas at Austin
  3. 3Department of Psychology, University of Edinburgh
  1. Elliot M. Tucker-Drob, Department of Psychology, University of Texas at Austin, 108 E. Dean Keeton Stop A8000, Austin, TX 78712 E-mail: tuckerdrob{at}utexas.edu
  2. Timothy C. Bates, Department of Psychology, University of Edinburgh, 7 George Square, Edinburgh, Scotland EH8 9JZ E-mail: tim.bates{at}ed.ac.uk
  1. Author Contributions E. M. Tucker-Drob and T. C. Bates conceived the project; acquired, reanalyzed, and standardized the data; and wrote the manuscript. E. M. Tucker-Drob conducted the meta-analyses and power analyses. Both authors contributed equally to this article.

Abstract

A core hypothesis in developmental theory predicts that genetic influences on intelligence and academic achievement are suppressed under conditions of socioeconomic privation and more fully realized under conditions of socioeconomic advantage: a Gene × Childhood Socioeconomic Status (SES) interaction. Tests of this hypothesis have produced apparently inconsistent results. We performed a meta-analysis of tests of Gene × SES interaction on intelligence and academic-achievement test scores, allowing for stratification by nation (United States vs. non–United States), and we conducted rigorous tests for publication bias and between-studies heterogeneity. In U.S. studies, we found clear support for moderately sized Gene × SES effects. In studies from Western Europe and Australia, where social policies ensure more uniform access to high-quality education and health care, Gene × SES effects were zero or reversed.

Article Notes

  • Received June 12, 2015.
  • Accepted September 29, 2015.